We don't comment on the appearance/style/astethetics around here as I understand things. Function/safety yes but if a person wants to take a sawzall to their rig or drive something more trail carnage than an Iraqui taxi cab then that is fine. If they want to rattle can it cammo that is fine.
As a matter of course my understanding is that we don't brand bash or make negitive comments on anything outside of function/safety.
I hate Wannabe High Road talk like this. Function and safety are fair game, but aesthetics are not. This is moron talk. It's moron talk from McMorons (who can't spell for shit) trying to take the High Road. It's especially moronic for a board like ExPo where 99% of the modifications are done for looks rather than function.
This 1leglance has absolutely no sense of fair play. He thinks that because it's wrong to criticize someone's ugly face, it must also be wrong to criticize someone's car modifications. That the ugly person had no control over his facial features but had control over his his vehicle modifications doesn't even occur to him. He's that stupid.
This 1leglance also cannot seem to grasp the idea that this SpencerFitch hack opened the door to comment (positive or negative) about his build by starting a build thread and posting pics.
I remember this 1leglance guy. I think he's a chump. I can't find the thread, but there was a thread on ExPo where 1leglance thought pics of black rifles were not appropriate for posting on ExPo. I'm guessing if the poster had posted a pic of a Mini-14, 1leglance wouldn't have had any problem with the gun. This 1leglance is just dumb enough to see an AR and think "bad gun" and then see a Mini-14 and think "good gun", even though the "function/safety" of the two weapons are identical and they differ only in "appearance/style/astethetics". This guy is so stupid he doesn't even follow his own nonsensical rules.
And this 1leglance is a moderator on ExPo. This is one reason why ExPo is such a lousy site.
No comments:
Post a Comment